How to Make Vibe Coding Production-Ready (Without Losing Your Mind)

What I learned fixing security holes, cleaning up technical debt, and fighting off skill atrophy while shipping real apps with AI.

Do you vibe code?

Have you run into any headaches along the way?

If you scroll through X, Reddit, or even mainstream media, you’ll eventually stumble into the vibe coding hate train. Someone on Reddit once asked, “Why is the vibecoding community not friendly”, the comments were not merciful.

The complaints are everywhere. Developers call it “productivity theater.” Security experts highlight glaring vulnerabilities. Senior engineers groan that it creates “pseudo-developers” who can’t maintain their own code.

There are so many problems on the surface… but when I looked closer, most of them really boil down to three core issues:

• Security.

• Technical Debt.

• Skill Atrophy.

Read through the negative sentiment online and you’d think vibe coding is destroying software development.

After building dozens of toy projects and actually shipping several production apps with AI assistance, I hit almost every trap the critics warned about. But fixing these issues taught me something I wasn't expecting.

I wasn’t just learning to code with AI. I was stumbling into a new role, a job that didn’t really exist a couple of years ago. And the more I dug in, the more I realized: the critics aren’t entirely right, but the enthusiasts aren’t either. The real story is somewhere else entirely.

In this article, I’ll share the journey outlined below:

• Problem 1: The Security Blind Spot

• Problem 2: The Technical Debt Spiral

• Problem 3: The Skill Atrophy Trap

• Part 4: The Moment Everything Clicked

• Part 5: Where This Is All Heading

• Part 6: Your Checklist Template

Let’s dive in.

---

Problem 1: The Security Blind Spot

How it happened to me

I’ve hit security problems more than once while vibe coding:

1. Plaintext passwords.

When I was building Image Finder at the end of 2024, everything looked smooth. Authentication worked, users could log in. Then I peeked into the database.
Passwords were stored as literal "password". No hashing. No encryption. Just sitting there in plain text like a “what not to do” example from a security textbook.

I only caught it because I already knew passwords should never be stored as-is.

2. Direct use of environment variables.

In a toy project, AI dropped my database connection string straight into the script, no .env, no safeguards.

3. API key leakage.

On my personal site, AI generated code that called API keys directly from the client side. Anyone could open dev tools and see my private keys.

Each of these would’ve been catastrophic if they had slipped into production unnoticed.

What I did to fix it

Here’s the system I’ve built up over time:

• Rule files.
  Every time I catch a bad practice (like storing passwords directly), I write it into a “rules file” that Cursor reads before generating code. Since doing this, I haven’t seen those same naive mistakes resurface.

• AI code reviews.
  If I’m unsure, I literally ask AI to roast its own code:
  “Find all security problems and fix them.” This saved me when Claude immediately flagged the client-side API key calls and rewrote the flow correctly.

• Security-first prompting.
  I now prompt AI explicitly:

Implement this following programmer guidelines, with server-side validation, secret management, and protection against injection attacks.

• Platforms with guardrails.
  I mostly stick with Supabase for auth, Stripe for payments, Cloudflare for security. Popular platforms have built-in best practices AI follows more consistently.

• Know your limits.
  I still never trust AI with cryptography. Every time I’ve asked for “custom encryption,” it produced subtle but dangerous mistakes. For that, I only use established libraries.

Thankfully, with the evolution of both AI and user experience, Cursor (my favorite IDE) has built-in guardrails to help catch potentially risky actions.

The point is: vibe coding doesn’t mean you just hand everything off. I love interacting with AI and I do give it trust, but I also keep my own guardrails. Frameworks catch the obvious stuff, but business logic security still needs human reasoning.

The bigger lesson

AI optimizes for working code, not secure code. That’s the fundamental issue.

And unless you actually know your code, you won’t catch it. Which… leads right into the next problem: technical debt.

---

Problem 2: The Technical Debt Spiral

Ever feel like AI has no memory for what it just built? Like it happily forgets what it did five minutes ago, and then recreates the exact same thing, but different? That’s technical debt in its AI form.

How it Happened to Me

1. Feature inconsistency

This hit me head-on while upgrading Quick Viral Notes.

I needed edit boxes in a few different places across the app. Seemed simple enough. I just asked AI: “Add one editor here, another over there, and one more in that page…”

And it worked… until the next day.

When I tried to update the editor functionality across the app, I was juggling three separate editors:
- each location had its own editor component,
- completely different styling and logic,
- slightly different bugs.

So updating one didn’t fix the others. Such a classic violation of DRY (Don’t Repeat Yourself).

2. Performance issues

I saw this most painfully in Substack Explorer.
At first, it felt perfect with smooth UI and functional data fetching. But as soon as I supplied large sets of data, it slowed to a crawl.

Feeding more data into the Substack Explorer database slowed the app down to the point it needed a system-level fix.

Turns out:

• every single request was being made separately,

• no caching,

• no query optimization,

• a giant pile of N+1 problems.

The code worked. But the system design was broken.

What I did to fix it

My first move was obvious: force a refactor. I asked AI to “create a reusable editor component” and consolidated everything into one.

For the next apps, I got more systematic:

• Frameworks. Sticking to React/Next.js patterns helps AI follow consistent habits.

• Instruction files. I now keep a living doc in every project that Cursor reads. It spells out:

  • naming conventions,

  • database schema rules,

  • fetching best practices,

  • and a note to “never create duplicates without asking first.”

The bigger lesson

This is where vibe coding shows its true weakness: it optimizes for “does this feature work right now?”, not “will this system hold up over time?”

This isn’t just an AI problem. Even professional developers debate database schemas, caching strategies, state management patterns. The difference is: professionals at least know when they’re making a trade-off. AI just doesn’t think that way.

So when critics say vibe coding produces “demo apps that collapse under real load”, they’re not wrong. I’ve lived that.

---

Problem 3: The Skill Atrophy Trap

How it happened to me

Have you ever had that sinking feeling when someone asks you to explain something you supposedly built?

That was me, early in my vibe coding days. I’d gotten drunk on the speed. My whole attitude was: “Just build everything. Claude, make it work.” And it did work. Beautiful, functional apps showing up on my screen faster than I’d ever managed before.

Until the day someone asked me about the implementation details. I opened the codebase, stared at the AI-generated logic, and realized: I had absolutely no idea how it worked.

Sure, I could describe what the app was supposed to do. But the actual implementation? The logic flow? The data structures? I was blank.

I felt like a manager who’d been away from the shop floor so long that they couldn’t actually operate their own machine anymore. And when you can’t explain the code that sits under your own name, it makes you feel nervous, ungrounded.

What I did to mitigate it

I started forcing myself to slow down and build some habits:

• Know your problem before coding. I stopped saying “just make it work” and instead clarified exactly what I wanted and why. Even if AI handled the heavy lifting, I understood the requirements.

• Maintain core programming principles. Components, state, data flow, just enough fundamentals to guide AI and spot when it was doing something silly.

• Document everything. Every time I debugged something painful, I had AI summarize our dead ends, our solutions, and the lessons. That way when I felt lost again, I had a paper trail of my own thinking.

This helped a lot. But it didn’t erase the bigger issue: complex debugging still demands technical intuition, the kind that atrophies if you don’t practice it.

The scariest part

The more I leaned on AI, the more subtle costs I started noticing:

• Decision paralysis.
  When AI gives you five “valid” solutions. Which one do you choose if you don’t deeply understand the trade-offs? I caught myself picking what sounded right, not what was right.

• Context switching.
  You’re constantly bouncing between your own thinking and AI’s suggestions. It keeps you from ever getting into real deep work mode, you’re stuck in “prompt, evaluate, prompt, evaluate” cycles.

• False confidence.
  AI writes with such authority that you believe the solution is solid. You ship it, only to discover scaling issues or nasty edge cases later.

But the scariest part isn’t even technical. It’s psychological.

I talked to a developer who’d been vibe coding for eight months. He said it felt like “imposter syndrome on steroids.” He could ship features like crazy, but when it came to architectural decisions, he felt unqualified.

You don’t just forget syntax. You lose the mental “muscle” of reasoning through code, of debugging deeply, of thinking in systems.

---

Part 4: The Moment Everything Clicked

Let me be honest: I did not fix all the problems with vibe coding.

Not for production, not even close. And in the future, I probably won’t fix everything either, even as my knowledge and skill improve.

And that’s okay.

Because this isn’t about perfection, it’s about learning to manage a new way of building.

After building across different apps, a pattern emerged:

• Security fixes didn’t come from AI being smarter. They came from me reviewing its work systematically.

• Technical debt fixes didn’t come from better prompts. They came from enforcing consistency with docs and guardrails.

• Skill atrophy fixes didn’t come from AI teaching fundamentals. They came from me drawing lines, what I must understand vs. what I can safely delegate.

That’s when it clicked:

The problems might be coming from the AI, but they can be solved by better management.

Management of tools.
Management of expectations.
Management of my own intellectual diligence.

The Role Shift

Think about it:

• If you were a PM, you’d set clear requirements, boundaries, and documentation.

• If you were onboarding a junior dev, you’d give them guardrails so they don’t wreck production.

• If you were coding solo, you’d enforce your own standards by habit.

But with AI? Most people wing it. Treat it casually. Hope for the best.

That’s the real shift.
With vibe coding, your role levels up: developer → AI manager.

And like any manager, you don’t eliminate problems, you manage trade-offs.

Where Vibe Coding Actually Shines

So what should you really expect from vibe coding?

Most people say: “it’s good for prototyping and side projects.” True. But that undersells it.

1. Compression of effort.

Before AI, I spent three weeks of evenings digging into housing market data—learning APIs, cleaning responses, analyzing trends, and writing it up.

Now? I can do the same (actually deeper) study in under a week.

AI doesn’t remove the thinking. It compresses the overhead. And when prototyping becomes that easy, expertise has room to shine.

2. Amplifier of expertise.

Imagine domain experts lean in:

• Lawyers building legal workflow tools.

• Doctors designing apps around patient care.

• Real estate analysts scaling their insights into products.

Would you use those tools? I know I would.
That’s not toy projects. That’s production with leverage.

3. Beyond prototyping

If AI can help me prototype, why can’t it also help me ship?

The difference isn’t whether AI can produce production code, it’s whether I can guide it, fill in the gaps, and manage the process.

The Misconception

Here’s where people trip up: they expect AI to act like enterprise software.
As if “AI = finished system.”

But the same model behaves wildly differently depending on how it’s packaged:

• In Microsoft Copilot, it feels sluggish.

• In Cursor, it feels sharp and responsive.

• In specialized tools like Manus or Genspark, it feels entirely different again.

It’s tempting to dream of one-shot perfection, drop a single prompt, get a polished app. Fun? Absolutely. Realistic? Not at all.

Just like you’d never create a flawless presentation in one sitting, AI code needs iteration, structure, and human judgment.

And whether we like it or not, vibe coding is already everywhere in modern dev:
Autocomplete; Scaffolding; Debugging; Documentation.

It’s not a side experiment anymore. It is production.
And what matters isn’t the code it spits out, it’s the intention and human guidance wrapped around it.

---

Part 5: Where This Is All Heading

The vibe coding debate misses the real question:
What kind of developer do you want to be when AI can already write most of the code?

What’s emerging isn’t just “developer + AI.”
It’s a new role: Technical Product Builder.

Someone who:

• Thinks architecturally enough to guide AI toward sane design

• Stays security-aware enough to catch what AI misses

• Builds debugging intuition for when things break weirdly

• Brings domain knowledge to decide what matters and why

• Manages AI like a capable teammate

But also someone who doesn’t need to reinvent every wheel or memorize every API.

The future doesn’t belong to people who can code without AI.
And it doesn’t belong to people who trust AI blindly.

It belongs to those who can manage AI effectively, who use it with intention, with structure, and with just enough technical depth to validate the results.

Your Next Move

On your next project, try this sequence:

1. Clarify before you code. Write down the concept and requirements yourself, then use AI as your “junior dev” to implement.

2. Prototype fast. Let AI scaffold features, but review them with a critical eye.

3. Run a security sweep. Use a simple checklist: inputs validated, secrets safe, endpoints protected.

4. Document decisions. Keep a lightweight log of what you built, why, and how data flows.

5. Stress test one thing. Pick a part of your project (auth, DB queries, scaling) and push it harder than AI assumes.

See what breaks. See what AI nails. See where you need to step in.

---

Part 6: Your Checklist

I've created an AI Vibe Coding Management Checklist that covers all three problem areas to help you vibe code with guardrails.

→ Get the Free AI Management Checklist

This starter version includes:

• ✅ Security review checklist with quick tests you can run today

• ✅ Technical debt prevention framework for cleaner code

• ✅ Skill development guidelines to maintain technical understanding

• ✅ Pre-launch checklist for production readiness

The exact prompts, templates, and rules files I've used along the way will be available this Sunday in premium resources.

Already building with AI? I’d love to hear: What’s your biggest challenge when managing AI for real projects?

Want more eyes on your project? Showcase it in the Vibe Coding Builders for free.